Monday, June 11, 2007
How Can I Find a Good Mortgage Broker? - A Guide to Using Mortgage Brokers Part 3
11th June 2007. In the third and final part of this blog on mortgage brokers, I’ll look at whether the commission fees paid out by mortgage lenders to mortgage brokers could result in a conflict of interest and customers getting offered a less than optimum buy to let mortgage loan. (For parts one and two of this topic, please see the blogs dated 24th May and 5th June.)
It’s worth making it clear that mortgages for business purposes – such as a buy to let mortgage loan – do not get the same degree of protection as a normal residential mortgage does, so there is an inherent enhanced risk that a broker could sell you an unsuitable product.
For example, suppose a mortgage broker has two lenders – both with similar products - but one pays him a higher commission than the other. Clearly, the one with the higher commission is more likely to get the business.
Alternatively, the broker may decide to reduce the fee he charges to the customer from the higher commission paid by the lender. (Most mortgage brokers charge their client a fee as well as getting a commission from the lender)
Of course, a problem exists if the customer is not offered what would have been a better product because of commission differentials paid by the lender.
The risk is all the greater if a broker only gets remuneration from the procuration fee paid by the lender (i.e. say, because he chooses not to charge the client at all).
Clearly, in this case, he is going to be more driven by procuration fees than if he is getting paid from both client and lender and will be most unlikely to recommend a lender that does not pay a fee.
It’s worth knowing too, that most lenders now also pay so called, “repeat fees" to brokers. These are paid to intermediaries by lenders if they advise existing borrowers to remortgage with the same bank or building society.
These types of fee are relatively new but the amounts paid have increased in recent years as each bank and society lender tries to stop the loss of business to other lenders.
Clearly, these payments could mean an intermediary encourages a client to remortgage with the same lender even though a better deal is on offer with another lender.
However, don’t be too worried, because as another broker told me “Our business is based on our reputation, so it is not in our interest to recommend a mortgage loan purely based on commission -especially in the buy let arena where we want landlords to keep coming back as they build up their property businesses.”
At the end of the day, as ever, it always pays to shop around. If you use a mortgage broker to arrange a buy to let mortgage, don’t be afraid to ask him what fee he is getting from the lender. Then check on the net that what he has offered you looks good.
But, be prepared to pay him for the work he has put in on your behalf. In other words, be aware, ask questions – but don’t be mean!
David Lawrenson is the author of “Successful Property Letting.” His website is at www.lettingfocus.co.uk Copyright: David Lawrenson 2007.
It’s worth making it clear that mortgages for business purposes – such as a buy to let mortgage loan – do not get the same degree of protection as a normal residential mortgage does, so there is an inherent enhanced risk that a broker could sell you an unsuitable product.
For example, suppose a mortgage broker has two lenders – both with similar products - but one pays him a higher commission than the other. Clearly, the one with the higher commission is more likely to get the business.
Alternatively, the broker may decide to reduce the fee he charges to the customer from the higher commission paid by the lender. (Most mortgage brokers charge their client a fee as well as getting a commission from the lender)
Of course, a problem exists if the customer is not offered what would have been a better product because of commission differentials paid by the lender.
The risk is all the greater if a broker only gets remuneration from the procuration fee paid by the lender (i.e. say, because he chooses not to charge the client at all).
Clearly, in this case, he is going to be more driven by procuration fees than if he is getting paid from both client and lender and will be most unlikely to recommend a lender that does not pay a fee.
It’s worth knowing too, that most lenders now also pay so called, “repeat fees" to brokers. These are paid to intermediaries by lenders if they advise existing borrowers to remortgage with the same bank or building society.
These types of fee are relatively new but the amounts paid have increased in recent years as each bank and society lender tries to stop the loss of business to other lenders.
Clearly, these payments could mean an intermediary encourages a client to remortgage with the same lender even though a better deal is on offer with another lender.
However, don’t be too worried, because as another broker told me “Our business is based on our reputation, so it is not in our interest to recommend a mortgage loan purely based on commission -especially in the buy let arena where we want landlords to keep coming back as they build up their property businesses.”
At the end of the day, as ever, it always pays to shop around. If you use a mortgage broker to arrange a buy to let mortgage, don’t be afraid to ask him what fee he is getting from the lender. Then check on the net that what he has offered you looks good.
But, be prepared to pay him for the work he has put in on your behalf. In other words, be aware, ask questions – but don’t be mean!
David Lawrenson is the author of “Successful Property Letting.” His website is at www.lettingfocus.co.uk Copyright: David Lawrenson 2007.
Labels: buy to let, mortgage brokers, mortgage loans

recent comments