The Coming Digital Prison and what you can do to try to Prevent it Happening

The Coming Digital Prison and what you can do to try to Prevent it Happening

This post is not about property. But in many ways is far more important. It looks at what could happen in 2023 and coming years as well as considering the madness since March 2020.

Today, many respected senior scientists, including professors of medicine, epidemiology, physics and from other disciplines are still banned from talking openly, engaging in debate and are frequently de-platformed and threatened with unemployment if they dare discuss the actual real science on Covid “lockdowns” or the trail of destruction of the experimental gene therapies, (cleverly branded as “vaccines”). The same goes for the real science around new hobgoblins such as “global warming”. For these banned experts, censorship is very much NOT OVER.

One such expert who remains targeted and banned from many mainstream and online media is leading statistics expert, Professor Norman Fenton. Others include leading oncologist Professor Angus Dalgleish and Professor of Medicine, Jay Bhattacharya. (See the link and quotes at the bottom of this piece from Fenton).

This censorship worries me, and I feel it ought to worry other people. Indeed, the banning of free speech in many countries, is even being legislated for. In the EU it already has been via their Digital Services Act. The EU are effectively saying, “So, if Elon Musk won’t do it, we will instead legislate to ban free speech or any so called “disinformation” we don’t like”. The UK had similar plans to ban free speech via the Online Harms Bill, as do many other jurisdictions.

But as if that was not bad enough, I must then point out this is about far more than “just Covid”, which is why I believe the purpose behind what was clearly a lab-generated pathogen was always much deeper – and had two main objectives:

The first objective was to see if the propaganda techniques first used by the Nazis and the Soviets could be used on an even grander scale.

So, what came under the heading of this first objective? And what did those controlling this want to test and to see?

They wanted to look at a number of things.

They wanted to see if people could really be coerced by enough wall-to-wall mass “news” and panic-spreading psy op techniques to get them to agree to be injected multiple times to “protect themselves” against what for most people amounted to nothing more than a bad cold or seasonal flu. (Stanford University estimated across 32 studies, the median infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was 0.035% for people aged 0-59 years. 95% of those who succumbed had multiple existing co-morbidities. See table below). 

Could people really be persuaded to take a risky experimental gene therapy treatment in exchange for being allowed to carry on with their “normal life”? Of course, it was kept quiet from people that the makers of the gene therapies / “vaccines” refuse to pay for any damages resulting from that treatment, out of the massive profits generated for them by tens of billions of pounds of free taxpayer-funded marketing. I wonder why this important aspect was kept so quiet from the public.

Could people really be persuaded to ignore the 1.5million (as of October 2022) cases of Covid “vaccine” injuries, reported by 460,000 people that have already been listed on the UK government’s Yellow Card scheme? And then there is the small matter of the 2,600 deaths? (These figures are thought to be between 1% and 10% of the true casualty rates based on surveys in the US and Japan where similar reporting systems are in place).

Could people later be persuaded to ignore the Covid “vaccines” role in suppressing peoples’ immune systems which has led to excess deaths from all causes currently running at between 15% and 30% above the five-year average in the most “vaccinated” countries?

Could people be persuaded to ignore the significant falls in the birth rate ever since the “vaccines” were first rolled out? Or the rises in miscarriages?

The answer to all these questions was “Yes”.  With enough wall-to-wall propaganda and monies spent, this could all be done.

None of this should be a surprise because these sorts of psy op techniques were investigated fully in the conformity and obedience experiments conducted in the 1960s by Asch and Milgram respectively. Their work was an attempt to see if the mind control used by the Nazis and Soviets could be understood and explained in a a test setting. They showed how easily people could be persuaded to conform and to obey authority figures. These studies should be familiar to anyone who has studied GCSE level psychology, though sadly many seem to be unaware when these techniques were being practiced on them, as they were starting in March 2020.

The second and main objectives were more long term and more insidious still, which is why the “Covid is over” narrative is so misplaced.

The main longer-term objective is to massively increase digital surveillance to the same level that’s now the “New Normal” in China.

And so, Covid restrictions and the “vaccines” were both used as a tool to get populations familiar with accepting surveillance through the widespread use of things like QR codes and health passports to either admit (or refuse) entry to restaurants, bars, concerts, hospitals and other places, at the whim of governments. This is because the QR codes and test and trace systems used in Covid restrictions are fully intended to form the basis for this more extended digital surveillance.

To fully implement surveillance though would require the roll out of something called central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). These allow governments to control and monitor what people spend their money on and where they spend it. Even more powerful.

So, I predict the next step in this process will be the stated “need” to control people’s carbon footprint. This in itself is a product of the scare of the “climateaggeddon” hobgoblin – which is that climate warming is supposedly caused mostly by carbon dioxide increases and hence mostly the fault of humans.

I expect the central bank digital currencies will initially be offered to the poor in exchange for debt relief and/ or as a condition of receiving things like universal credit.

Later, it will be offered more widely to other income groups at such time as the next accidental (or planned) financial crisis occurs. The message here will be: “Sorry that your building society has gone bust, but here is a new CBDC account with the same amount in it”. As of November 2022, ten countries have already got CBDCs live.

The difference with the CBDCs and a normal bank account is that with CBDCs credits can be awarded to control people by rewarding low carbon spends and applying penalties for high carbon spends.

For the poor, credits might be set so they can be used only on certain items and be limited in time (thus also controlling the level of aggregate demand in the economy in real time). Banning the use of credits for items like alcohol, cigarettes, fast food and gambling would find favour with those not on benefits who think all the poor are scroungers and will be sold heavily as a “useful feature”.  

But there are other uses too. So, some examples:

• Too much meat consumption will mean your digital account will prevent you buying any more.
• Too much travelling in your car and your digital account will prevent you from buying petrol, or if you have a connected-up electric car, it just won’t start.
• Too much foreign travel and you won’t be able to buy any more flights.

But it goes further still:

• Publish something deemed to be “misinformation” online in breach of the Online Harms Act (or its successors) and you can expect a fine on your CBDC account as well as your social media account possibly being closed.
• Attend a rally that the ruling powers don’t like under new laws and you could be fined via your CBDC account or have your movement curtailed. (This has already happened in Canada).
• Finally, on the health front, credits on CBDC accounts will be given for “grade A” people who keep their injections up to date and penalties for those who don’t.

If this all sounds far-fetched or a “conspiracy theory”, then I would direct people to consider that a lot of what has happened already since March 2020 was very much predicted in the book, “The Great Reset” by the leader of the World Economic Forum and intellectual guru of the global elite, Klaus Schwab. Indeed, what has happened in the last three years would, back in January 2020, be surely described by any sane person as a “conspiracy theory”.

The future sequence of events I have described here is also covered and predicted in the same book in great detail. Mr. Schwab thinks this digital prison world is a perfect world, in which “people will own nothing, but they will be happy”. That is one of his key quotes. This ought to beg the question, if the masses own nothing, then who will own things in Mr. Schwab’s brave new world?

Klaus Schwab regularly meets the world’s government leaders at all the key summits, including most recently at an evening event just after the recent G20.

We should all ask, “Why is he there and why does he matter so much to the world’s leaders?” Herr. Schwab has openly boasted about his penetration of the world’s governments many times, including most stridently in a speech in 2017 – see the link in the footnotes.

If people are sceptical of what I have stated here, I would plead with them to read Mr. Schwab’s books or at least read the reviews.

We need to wake up – and very fast.

So, what can be done?

• We need to do our own research, (not on the controlled Google please, you won’t find much there – you could try the “Brave” search engine). Or ask already “awake” people where they go to get the real science from proper senior scientists, economists, engineers and medics.
• We need to stop complying with obviously pointless mandates like face nappy rules and the myriad dumb strictures that are still in place restricting freedom.
• We need to actively campaign for changes to break up the unaccountable and undemocratic global control systems that exist in health in which, for example the regulatory body for drugs in the UK, the MHRA, is 86% funded by drug manufacturers and staffed entirely by former senior employees of the same, via a revolving door.
• We need to change the World Health Organisation so it is no longer funded by Big Pharma. (Currently their third biggest funder is not a country, it is an individual – “vaccine” investor, Bill Gates). The solutions to the problems of the poor in the world lie much more in better food, clean water and sanitation, not failed drugs and vaccines.
• We need to demand that social media firms be forced to allow free speech and payment system organisations be banned from cutting off payment mechanisms or censoring people just because they don’t like their validly held opinions. If it is legal to say something in the real world, it should be legal to say it online too, even if it is wrong and even if it is offensive.
• The activities of Newsguard and the British Board of Film Censors, wherein they choke off advertising revenue to any site that fights against the globalist agenda by labelling them as “disinformation” or “adult sites” must be stopped. By doing this, they stop commercial companies advertising with the likes of free speech sites like GB News, TCW Defending Freedom and Daily Sceptics. Both Newsguard and BBFC have, like FullFact, FactCheck, Wikipedia and Facebook, all got shady globalist agenda parentage and backers.
• We must demand a proper investigation of the harms done by the so-called non pharmaceutical interventions such as Stay at Home orders and face nappy mandates. We must demand a full and open investigation of the harms done to both adults and children by Covid “vaccines” and by the mandates for these “vaccines”. We must not allow the events to be “memory holed”, (to borrow form Orwell’s “1984”), and we must absolutely refuse to “just move on” as though nothing happened.
• We must demand that every health worker, every care worker and every other worker in the UK (and worldwide) who was forced or coerced out of their job because they refused to get the so called “vaccine” is compensated in full for lost earnings and hurt.
• We must stop complying with all testing and tracing systems and get back to real science and basic, old fashioned knowledge which is, if you are ill, you stay home and don’t see old people. If you are well, you get on with your life.
• We need to start using cash more, we need to only trade with organisations that accept cash and refuse to give our money to those that don’t.

If we don’t do all these things, we really are heading straight to the digital slavery system that Schwab and his ilk want. 

FOOTNOTE 1

This links to an interview with Professor Norman Fenton, one of the UK’s leading statisticians and risk management experts, published in Nov 2021.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/forum-conversation-norman-fenton

It shows, using detailed statistical analysis, that

a) the injected are getting Covid more often than the non-injected and

b) the injected are suffering a higher death and hospitalisation rate too.

He uses UK and German data to show this.

Data from Germany is especially useful because

a) the data is high quality and

b) in Germany, the eastern states had a far lower rate of “vaccine” take-up than western states.

The analysis shows the lowly injected eastern states also had a far lower rate of Covid infection, hospitalisation, death, but also fewer excess deaths from all diseases in general over the last two years since the “vaccination” roll out started.

The Professor also uses the high quality of German demographic data to adjust for differences in age between the different states. His conclusion is: the “vaccines” just do not work on any level whatsoever – not to prevent spread of Covid, not to reduce risk of hospitalisation from Covid nor death from Covid. And they also lead to higher excess death rates from all causes.

Professor Fenton goes on,

“What you actually see is the countries with the lowest COVID mortality rates are essentially the African countries with very low vaccination rates. Now, the average population age in African countries is lower than elsewhere, so this is a factor, but even among highly comparable countries, those which have high vaccination have higher mortality rates. Australia, for example, currently has the highest COVID mortality rate in the world and claims 96% are vaccinated. There are variables, but there is certainly no correlation showing that vaccinated populations have a lower chance of dying from COVID.”

“Through requests based on freedom of information we have indisputable numbers for the UK from over the first two years. And out of 136,000 deaths formally classified as from COVID on their death certificates, about 5000, only 5%, didn’t have at least one other comorbidity. In this group, there were only three children under the age of 20”.

“In many of the big observational trials conducted after the vaccine rollout, anyone who was vaccinated and who got COVID within two weeks, was classified as an unvaccinated person. The biased rationale behind this decision was that it takes at least two weeks for the vaccine to take effect. This misclassification became accepted as a worldwide practice that distorted the data everywhere. Everything done (in the trials and after) was to justify vaccine rollouts and give subsequent doses”.

“They sold us a lie. They told us that if you took the vaccine, you wouldn’t get COVID and you couldn’t transmit it. Now we are finding out that it’s the people who received the vaccine multiple times who are getting COVID more than once, rather than the unvaccinated. We’ve got the numbers showing that in each age group; the vaccinated are disproportionately more likely to get COVID than the unvaccinated”.

“The true proportion of people who are unvaccinated matters in a major way. The Office of National Statistics [ONS] here in the UK made a bizarre claim that in May 2022 only 8% of the adult population is unvaccinated — those never having had one shot. We know that’s not true because the UK Health Security Agency has more reliable data that says it’s closer to 20% of adults in the UK who are unvaccinated; and that’s a conservative number. It may be closer to 30%. When you use this higher figure for unvaccinated, you have a more accurate sample of the population, and in every age group we see that there are more COVID cases among the vaccinated”.

“As of June 2022, we saw over 1.3 million adverse events showing in the VAERS database, (the US government database), a system widely accepted as flawed for underreporting. Even with these low numbers we knew that there had been about 30,000 deaths and over 165,000 hospitalizations caused by the COVID vaccines. In all previous years since VAERS began recording data, the total number of deaths reported from all vaccinations before COVID was around 10,000. So, there are three times as many deaths reported from the COVID vaccine in two years, compared to all deaths from all other vaccines in the reporting over the last 30 odd years. This should be taken as an obvious signal, stopping the COVID vaccine program for reevaluation, but again these numbers are dismissed”.

“In recent weeks there has indeed been more widespread awareness that the mainstream narrative about both the lethality of the virus and the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines has been exaggerated. And as a result, in the UK for sure, we are seeing much lower take-up of the latest vaccine boosters than the previous ones. However, there is still extreme censorship relating to data on vaccine deaths and injuries — and a reluctance to even hear the stories of those people who are vaccine-injured or bereaved. My concern is that we may never know the true long-term safety of the vaccines because there has been such a concerted attempt to eliminate the control group — those people who were never vaccinated. We are now seeing excess death increases in the most highly vaccinated countries. But in the absence of accurate or sufficient data about how many of these are unvaccinated compared to vaccinated, the mainstream narrative is suggesting every possible cause other than the vaccines”.
“The notion of long COVID as a major cause of problems is especially being promoted as this strengthens the argument that COVID is debilitating and lethal and further supports the need for continued vaccination. This hypothesis could easily be tested if we had accurate data comparing long COVID in the vaccinated and unvaccinated. But we have found that no such data are being collected”.

FOOTNOTE 2

Imperial College and Professor Neil Ferguson estimated the infection fatalist rate (IFR) at 0.9% in March 2020, giving 510k U.K. deaths and 2.2m US deaths. This was discredited as nonsense and a massive over-statement as early as April 2020. More recently, Professor Jon Ioannidis et al of Stanford University estimated across 32 studies, the median IFR of COVID-19 was 0.035% for people aged 0-59 years and 0.501% for those aged 60-69: 

Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly informed from pre-vaccination national seroprevalence studies | medRxiv

FOOTNOTE 3

Link to article and video in which Klaus Schwab boasts about his control of the world’s leading governments.

Klaus Schwab Brags About Controlling Western Governments (humansbefree.com)

This is a link to around 500 of the best news articles from the whole of 2022 (as not reported by your mainstream news!): https://lettingfocus.com/important-news/2022-articles.html

All our other articles on the Covid Lunacy:

Follow the Current Thing Please – Letting Focus

25th October 2023

The Failures of the Left and Centre, the Supposedly Educated and the Media – Letting Focus

21st June 2023

Don’t Get Property Knowledge (or knowledge about much else) Just From Mainstream News Sources – Letting Focus

26th April 2023

The Coming Digital Prison and what you can do to try to Prevent it Happening – Letting Focus

22nd December 2022

How the Centre and Left Became Cheerleaders for Huge Global Corporations in the Media, Tech and Pharma and How this was Planned All Along as Part of The Great Reset – Letting Focus

12th October 2022

Digital control, surveillance and the new normal – what will happen next – Letting Focus

6^th May 2022

Just How Did They Get Away With Telling All Those Covid Lies – Letting Focus

16^th February 2022

The Great Reset and the coming banking crash – Letting Focus

3^rd January 2022

MORE covid cult TRUTH….AND SOME nonsense – Letting Focus

15^th September 2021

Nationalisation and confiscation of private rented property – Letting Focus

2^nd September 2021

New Non Gas BoilerS will cost you more, but Greta Wills It – Letting Focus

7^th August 2021

The Covid Lies and who is behind them and what they want – Letting Focus

7^th July 2021

Counterblast to Covid and Lockdown zealots – Letting Focus

10^th December 2020

Coronavirus covid 19 Our View – Letting Focus

1^st April 2020

ABOUT LETTINGFOCUS

HOME PAGE OF THIS BLOG: Blog

THE HOME PAGE OF THE MAIN SITE: Home – Letting Focus

IN THE MEDIA: Recent Press Coverage

TWITTER PAGE Twitter has banned me twice permanently for life. (I was unbanned permanently once, I may be the only person that has ever happened to). The ban is for having “Wrong Thoughts” and “Provoking Quarrels” mainly about coercive Convid injections and lockdowns but they may relent and put me back live again, one of these days: Twitter 

COPYRIGHT: DAVID LAWRENSON